| Teacher ResourcesPower, Acceptance, and Motivation in “The Snake” and “The Vigilante”: Creative Writing and Analysis
 by Julia Webb, New Haven Academy, 2009
ObjectivesConceptsMy semester-long course focuses on character motivation and   desire.  In class, we will consider how our motives are affected by   needs for acceptance and power.  To begin the year, we will read   selected stories from The Long Valley to begin to grapple with   this connection between power and acceptance and our motives.  The goal   is to begin a conversation that will last for the semester.  Skills I am always trying to find ways to get my students to think   more critically about author’s choices and the craft of writing.  In   their analytical work, my students often struggle to see a text as the   product of purposeful decision making with intentions to create   meaningful characters and themes.  For this unit, an introduction to my   11th and 12th grade course, I want students to use   both their own short story writing and the analysis of Steinbeck’s   stories to make clearer how authors’ choices build meaning. TextsFrom The Long Valley by John Steinbeck:  
              “The Snake” “The Vigilante  From A Good Man is Hard to Find by Flannery O’Connor:  
              “A Good Man is Hard to Find” Procedures Previous Work Students will have spent a week discussing characterization,   description, and theme in short pieces of fiction.  Students will have   discussed these elements and written a few, two or three, of their own   pieces of short fiction.  Day One: “The Snake” (80 minute class) Reading: Students will read aloud “The   Snake.”  While reading, students will use post it notes to color code   for character description.  On their notes, they will write down the   page number, a small piece of the quotation, and their own perspectives   or questions. After reading, the whole class will share questions and   students will choose a question to explore in their writing/discussion.    Students will write for a few minutes and then discuss their responses   to the text.  This discussion will follow the dialogic approach, with   focus on student questions and interpretations.  After the discussion,   we will debrief about what went well, what we need to work on, which   ideas seemed particularly popular, or compelling, which ideas still seem   unclear. Writing: We will discuss issues of power and   desire and focus on the ways characters’ desires are revealed through   description.  Students will write a flash fiction piece about a   character who has a desire that seems hidden, but is slowly, and maybe   only partially revealed.   This piece will focus on internal and   external description to develop characterization.  Students will write   for 10 minutes. This piece can be revised further for their publication.    The students will then write a reflection, focusing on what they   noticed about their writing.  Students will share first the reflection   and then the rough piece.  We will listen to each piece quietly and then   discuss patterns in our writing and differences.  Homework: Read “The Vigilante” and mark up, writing down ideas, questions, moments that are surprising or confusing. Day Two: “The Vigilante” (80 minute class) Reading: Introduce post it notes with   color-coding: one color for theme/conflict; one for character; one for   figurative language.  Students take time to reread the vigilante and use   post it notes to annotate their thinking and analysis.  Students   brainstorm questions and choose questions to focus on for writing and   discussion.  Students write to prepare for discussion, focusing on   perspective and evidence.  Students will largely facilitate this   discussion with little interaction from teacher.  Two students will   observe the discussion, taking notes on the use of perspective and   evidence, creating tally sheets and quoted references to the discussion.    Simultaneously, the teacher will use laptop and overhead projector to   take and post discussion transcript.  Teacher can step in and ask   questions, echo ideas to move discussion.  At the end of discussion,   class will debrief.  This debrief will start with observers sharing   their notes.  Teacher will print out and distribute discussion   transcript for the next class.  Writing: We will discuss desire for power and   acceptance and its affects on characterization and motivation.  Students   will write a flash fiction piece where power or acceptance has affected   a character.  As with the earlier writing session, students will write   for a period of time, write a reflection, and then share both reflection   and flash fiction.  Finally, we will debrief.  Homework: Students will choose one of the   flash fiction pieces to expand into a completed first draft.  They can   choose pieces from this week or the previous week.  First drafts are due   the following class.  Rubric to be distributed and discussed in class. Drafting Process Students will submit a first draft of their flash fiction.    They will receive comments for revision and a completed rubric and work   on a final draft.  During this revision process, they will complete two   self-analysis writing assignments.  The first self-analysis will focus   on the first draft and ask students to consider their creation of   character using description.  Students will use quoted evidence from   their piece to support their assertions and will discussion spaces for   change and revision.  Students will complete the second self-analysis   after completing their final draft for publication.  This self-analysis   will ask students to consider changes made in the revision process and   overall conflicts and themes.  Day Three: Publication (45 minutes) The teacher will take each student’s fiction piece and compile   this work into a class publication.  In class, the students will each   receive a publication and spend the first 15 minutes read and making   notations on the pieces.  The teacher will then break the class into two   groups.  In each group, each author will take turns reading a selection   of the second self-analysis followed by a reading of his/her piece.    The audience will turn to the page of this piece and make notations for   feedback.  The audience will discuss what moments stood out in a piece   and ask the author follow up questions.  The author will take notes and   consider moments for revision.  This process will continue until   everyone has shared and received feedback.  The class will debrief about   what patterns came up in our writing and reflections on sharing our   work and receiving feedback.  Homework: Students will use the notes from class to add to the second self-analysis. |